Solution Performance Over Promises
Contains Proven Personal Results for USSR Demise (1984 - 1989), Welfare Reform (April 1995), Also Medicare/ Medicaid/Healthcare (In works April 9, 2001 - Present), Elderly Rights to life and tax saving/Terri Schiavo (August 27,2004), Social Security, Tort Reform, Sexual Predators (May 23, 2005), Illegal Imigrants (April 7, 2006), Suicide Bombers (April 22, 2007), Greenhouse Gases, Population, Education, Ethanol Hoax, Religion Compatibilities (January 4, 2008)
I sued 22 lawyers and WON!
These Solutions were sent to all governors, The President, and Congress.
Click lower left picture edge once to start and twice to stop video. It loads while playing which could pause play.
I sued a prestigious Southwest law firm for Legal Malpractice. They were 22 law
partners and owners. I represented myself because other lawyers wouldn't touch it.
They explained that if they took the case, then other law firms would reciprocally sue
them for legal malpractice. It is a self-interest them-against-us reasoning designed
to protect the members of their profession.
I don't tend to sue anyone, but these people deserved it. I justified 9 figures of damages
plus triple RICO (Federal Racketeering) damages. It was 3 months before the end of
discovery when they decided to settle. We were about to take depositions. They settled!
I am not a lawyer. My degree is in physics. The lawsuit was filed at the Superior Court
level. I was the Plaintiff. It was just me. I had no staff. The "Defendants' table" had
the 22 legal partners and owners plus up to eight partners of the insurance
company's law firm plus all the background law firm associates and staff.
This law firm is a Limited Liability Partnership, and they tried to exclude the individual
partners and owners from being individually named because they alleged that they were
protected under the LLP. If that were allowed to do this,
then I would only have 3 direct contacts and the partnership company named on the
lawsuit. This would be very bad because Limited Liability Partnerships tend to be
shell companies with minimal assets. It could have been a hallow victory. I found
loopholes, and the Limited Liability Partnership protection was denied. They were
treated like a General Partnership for this lawsuit. I was told that means any judgment
against them could be collected from all of them individually. They would be
individually liable. I could collect on a judgment from any of them individually or in
groups as I had the opportunity.
When I filed my legal briefs, I had to identify myself as "Plaintiff Pro Se". I
understand that means that I am representing myself. It was a fun, easy experience.
I feel that because I have a certain amount of reason and logic, that is all that is
necessary. There are the common sense clearly written Rules of Civil Procedure,
which must be followed. They don't have to be memorized. I just looked up the area
that I was working on, such as interrogatories or production of documents or
subpoenas. These rules are surprisingly brief and well written. The judge is out to
see that a fair trial takes place, so he was very helpful to see that I wouldn't miss the
few required deadlines for response. Each state's Rules of Civil Procedure are laid out
much the same way with minor changes added on a state-by-state basis. For example I
found that California's Rules of Civil Procedures looks similar to the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, which in turn looks familiar to California Family Court Rules of Civil
I subtly gave the 22 sued lawyers the opportunity to think that they could get away with
committing perjury on their declarations, and they allegedly proceeded to do so. Then I
used evidence they did not know I had to prove their repeated alleged committed fraud
on several instances. This allegedly fit right in with violation of the federal racketeering
laws, and they therefore became liable for triple damages. When they realized that I
could allegedly justify 9 figures for damages and triple RICO violation damages, they
decided to settle rather than drag this out with judgments and appeals possibly
lasting 15 years. I also let them know that I expected a 15-year litigation, so they
could not count on my being anxious about the time it was taking. It was just a
matter of dollars and cents and psychology. Lawyers and insurance companies like
to think in terms of risk/reward, and I gave them plenty to think about. So they settled
3 months before discovery had ended.
Weighing it out, it was a good idea not to hire lawyers to represent me in this legal
malpractice suit. What I would pay lawyers for this representation would come out of
any settlement funds or judgment; therefore I would feel a lot of pressure to keep my
legal costs down. This could provide less-than-desirable results. Why should I pay
anyone a number of dollars to represent me in a legal malpractice case? It would
cost me dearly for their fees. If I won I could only get back statutory legal fees (maybe
less than 1%). Our system of judgment is set up so everyone pays for their own legal
fees. I know lawyers like to say that if you represent yourself in court, you have a fool
for a client. I totally disagree. If I did not represent myself in court, I fell that I WOULD
BE A BIG FOOL. I ignored what lawyers told me as being self-serving advice. If I
was a fool, what does that make this prestigious law firm?
I found that I could subscribe to LexusNexus.com or some other case law computer
look up service for just the few months I needed them. I could pay them a little extra
and got them to do my case law look ups on a personal basis. They became my
research staff. Then I could just cut and paste directly into my briefs what they found
and sent to my computer. It was truly easy. My total costs were around $15,000 primarily
for copying a lot of production of documents that I requested from defendants.
All lawsuits are public record when they are filed. I could look up other suits and use
them as a pattern of how the paperwork is to be structured. Also the briefs coming
from the other side was a great training tool. I used scansoft.com's omnipage pro
software to read in (scan) the defendants briefs in word processing format so that I
could interject my arguments throughout in bold face and underlined thereby using defendants'
input as an exhibit with immediate interjected arguments against what Defendants wrote.
That was very effective because the judge had both sides' arguments and
counter-arguments in one document. It was obviously a very effective approach.
Solving social problems is much like solving physical problems. I list all the
parameters (considerations) and weight them in importance of impact on the
problem. Then I come up with the best overall solution. It is easy for me.
I have been asked why I don't run for President. The answer is I don't have 100 million
dollars. I have been married to my darling wife for 47 years, and we have one child
(born in the back seat of our car) and one grand child. My age is 69 years, but my
Mom and Dad lived for 89 and 91 years, respectively. I have a proven record of
bringing solutions together and convincing sufficient numbers to support them. I am
tenacious and tireless in this effort. After working up to 17 hours a day, 7 days a
week, I have enough funds to live on the rest of my life from age 50. At that point I
semi-retired, and I have been giving of myself by solving social problems.
My thoughts are to form a non-profit corporation so any money spent or collected
toward the support of social solutions will be tax deductible. The money would be
very efficiently utilized to support a candidate that will be best suited to solving this
country's problems in the future whether it is Rudy Giuliani, John Edwards, Hillary
Clinton, John McCain, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee or someone
Where are the solutions these career politicians have contributed while
in office? Promises alone are empty. Is it just one or two leadership accomplishments
over the past 20 years or is it on-going? The Presidency isn't for people who have
a lot of experience doing very little. I am not in office and have verifiably solved quite
a few national and international problems and gotten both parties to implement them.
Isn't that what true leadership of our government is all about?